They further problematised the Eurocentric gaze, the sovereignty of intentional subjectivity, authorship and untheorised appeals to global sisterhood and to women's experience. Such theories questioned the transparency of language, the fixity of meaning, claims to universalism and singular truth. Moreover, these absences in the important work of recovery that was being undertaken by feminist scholars and publishing houses were beginning to produce new, yet exclusionary, canons.Įven as these debates were being conducted within feminist literary and cultural studies, the increasing influence of poststructuralist, psychoanalytic and postcolonial theories was also making its mark. Chandra Talpade Mohanty is Professor of Women's Studies at Hamilton College and Core Faculty at the Union Institute and University in Cincinnati. The tendency to focus on the work of white, middle-class, Western, heterosexual women, often under a general heading of ‘women's writing’, had led to the silencing or marginalisation of issues of class, heterosexism, racism and the colonial legacy as they affected women's cultural production. By the 1980s, this process was increasingly being questioned by women critics who found both its underlying assumptions and the range of texts and traditions that it privileged narrow and exclusionary. It set out to recover the lost history of women's writing and to identify both a difference of view in women's writing and a feminine aesthetic. The second was to identify and analyse the specificity of women's writing. The first was to analyse literature as vehicle for reproducing and contesting patriarchal images of women in fictional texts.

In its formative years – the late 1960s and 1970s – second-wave feminist criticism in the West had two main aims.

Chandra talpade mohanty books